Anyone hear of XP3 Fuel Additive ?

Its "suppose" to increase your fuel mileage, but a business op. at the same time, Ive looked online and only find testimonials from thier site.
http://www.naturerich-inc.com/corporate/Xp3_product.cfm

If anyone is using it, please post up.

Rlopez250, i come from an automotive background. I recommend passing on it. Even if it did work, it would'nt be significant enough to negate the large increase in fuel prices. Only finding testimonials on their site should raise a flag. Try looking for something else.

Rlopez250: increase your fuel mileage, but a business op.
Every gas crisis, price increase, has brought out dozens of fuel savings scams.
Don't know this one in particular but if it has sign up fees that's your first clue.
Other than that you just need proof the claims are true before you repeat them.
Then again, if you just want to make money "there's a sucker born every minute".
I have yet to see a fuel additive that was cost effective even at $5 a gallon gas.
People buy when they think it will save them money or provide other benefits.
They only buy again if it really does.
A quick buck or a lifetime of income?

RICH,
Ive found some videos on Youtube, but they seem to be from people that are in the business opp. and are trying to sell it, a couple said that they recieved about 80 more miles out of a tank, BUT, no contact info for them..

Just2,
you can buy this stuff from a distibutor, so theres no sign up to get some and try it. If my match it correct, its about the same cost of Seafoam, which does work, Ive used it for awhile...

I think Im going to buy a torpedo of this stuff and try it, Im NOT going to sink $300 into the business opp.

I appreciate the replies. you guys are great.

Same old same old, but the bottom line is simple, all these fuel additives do nothing more than help clean up carbon from cylinders and head, valve train, etc., but any of the top name brand products can do the same thing at a fraction of price being asked for from any of the dozens of MLM companies I have researched over the years.

What they do is all the same, but you are induced to think you have to use these products on every gas fill, and this is where people are misled. Once you cylinders are clean, you only have to treat your fuel tank once every few months at most depending on how much you drive, not every day. Most will see an improvement when you treat your engine with any of these fuel additives, but don't think you will lose any MPG by not using it every tank, and I dare anyone to say differently. I have tested them all, dozens over the years.

The real test is let the EPA run it through their testing facilities, none ever have. And I don't mean simply registering ingredients as a fuel additive which everyone has to do, this means nothing regarding EPA performance testing which costs upwords of $20K plus, and to date, not one single company has gone through this lab testing procedure, ever wonder why? Because then the truth would be known that no increase in MPG or power will be realized.

Success to all,

well I bought a couple bottles of this to try out, and I got a 30% increase in my MPG. I am writtening everything down and will let you all more later.

Great for you,

Any fuel additive will do the same, so don't be misled into using it every tank, this is the typical misleading tactics all these deals use, so prove it to yourself, once your engine is cleaned or treated, which takes about three tanks of treatments with the average additive found at Walmart for a couple bucks, you won't have to use it again for months depending on how many miles you drive.

I have used several brands over the years, and almost all work the same, a few tanks adding cleaning additives will usually work for even older high mileage vehicles after a few treatments. The illusion is that most will see an improvement at first, like the above reports, but you don't need to add it to every tank is main point. Few will see 30%, and given most do not have a computer in their vehicles like ScanGage, or factory computer, you can see variables of up to 20% unless you were on a closed loop control track like the EPA does when putting products like this through their labs.

Success to all,

FREEBUSINESSES
Hi,

I just wanted people to hear another side to the story! I have been using Xp3 for 3 months and am getting an additional 3.6 miles per gallon to 4 miles per gallon on every tank. Currently, that is saving me over $8.50 per tank because I get the Xp3 for "free" as part of the business when I "cycle". Even if I had to pay for the tube of Xp3, I would still be saving over $6 per tank that I would lose otherwise.

Regarding using it in every tank, if my injectors and engine got "dirty" without it, why would I want to let that happen again? I have spoken to 2 different people at the EPA and they said that many companies don't spend the 20K to 30K to test the product because the EPA won't "endorse" it - even after being tested. The EPA said don't be suprised that companies don't test with us because it is costs a lot and doesn't give a "return".

Bottom line is savings! I am able to drive further on each tank and my car runs better! If I don't use Xp3, I am paying more to drive the same - WHY WOULD I DO THAT?

I encourage any dialogue on the subject, but please speak in facts not opinions. All Fuel Additives are not the same and I can prove by the testing done in this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIN9cZRZnx4

I am always looking to learn more, so if anyone can give an opposing view based on fact - please share it because I will seek answers for it!

Have a Great Day!

Tom

Pottertom: I have been using Xp3 for 3 months and am getting an additional 3.6 miles per gallon to 4 miles per gallon on every tank.
Pottertom: I have spoken to 2 different people at the EPA and they said that many companies don't spend the 20K to 30K to test the product because the EPA won't "endorse" it - even after being tested. The EPA said don't be suprised that companies don't test with us because it is costs a lot and doesn't give a "return".
"Doesn't give a return" - meaning they'll be exposed.
But anyway, this is all hearsay of course


Pottertom: I am always looking to learn more, so if anyone can give an opposing view based on fact
You might want to start with some actual, independent 3d party based investigation, and PROOF, instead of video of a magic trick, based on "facts".


Pottertom: Bottom line is savings! I am able to drive further on each tank and my car runs better! If I don't use Xp3, I am paying more to drive the same - WHY WOULD I DO THAT?
Bottom line is, you are selling a product.
Your statements are suspect.

This is why independent 3d party investigation and proof is essential.
Anyone who believes what an advertiser says, on the internet, short of anything less, is simply naive, to say the least.

Regarding using it in every tank, if my injectors and engine got "dirty" without it, why would I want to let that happen again? I have spoken to 2 different people at the EPA and they said that many companies don't spend the 20K to 30K to test the product because the EPA won't "endorse" it - even after being tested. The EPA said don't be suprised that companies don't test with us because it is costs a lot and doesn't give a "return".

Injectors do not get clogged over night, it takes over six months, if at all, and for good reason, all gas have additves to clean injestors these days, so a once every six months to a year cleaner is all you need to use, and with many on the market, most under $3.00, you do not need an additive with every fill up which is the real scam.

Not true, results are easy to evaluate from EPA, and I use to run a lab back when I was importing Mercedes Benz from Germany, so I know exactly how demanding EPA lab test is, and without it, you have nothing more than heresay, and variables which don't mean anything. You need controlled test lab on dyno, that is why no one will spend the $25K, they know what they will see, nothing. You don't need EPA endorsement, you need facts.

Good luck,

those that say "you dont need to clean your injectors every tank" etc etc, well that may be true, but from my understanding, this stuff disperses the water in the gas, you fill your tank with. Making the engine run better.....
Since I started using this, remember I just bought a 16oz bottle to try it out. Since then my mileagae has steadily INCREASED..
Im using a site called Fuelly to track it, http://www.fuelly.com/driver/ric/4runner
and just incase the link doesnt work, google Fuelly and search for Rix4runner.
I know that so far, for me, it wil doing as stated.

Rlopez250
Your calculator seems to be mistaken, it's not accounting for 2 fill ups.
The average mileage from your last 2 tanks comes out to 15.2mpg (526miles/34.44gal)
Doesn't sound like an increase to me, in fact it is below EPA estimates.
Are you seriously claiming you got 526 miles from one tank - 28.6mpg?
If that is true I'll gladly feed it to my 4Runner.

Rlopez250: those that say "you dont need to clean your injectors every tank" etc etc, well that may be true, but from my understanding, this stuff disperses the water in the gas, you fill your tank with. Making the engine run better.....
Sadly, they always claim way more than what it really does, after all, their game is to convince you to use it everytime you get gas, and that is not going to save you money, it will cost you money over the long term

If you have water in your gas, then change gas stations, or have your car repaired for water in a sealed system, which most late models all are equipped with ended condensation issues years ago, and then again, if you have a car with condensation issues, use dry gas, it is way cheaper.

Success to all,

Rlopez250
If you want a simple way to boost your 4Runner's mpg by 10%
use the trick the Water4Gas guys use to boost their mileage:
Wrap some aluminum foil around the Oxygen sensor on your tailpipe.
That will cause the computer to lean out the fuel by at least 10%.
Another trick is to put a resistor on the MAP sensor to give more air without more gas.
Under a buck and last forever.

any news updates on this xp3 GAS ADDITIVE stuff let me no if it work's thanks!

Does it help with the gummy, syrupy residue from ethanol?

Started using it as a major skeptic in Oct. in my 2008 GMC truck. Got 14 mpg late summer. Now in Dec in northern Minn. getting 17 mpg ave. in town after 9 tanks.Did watch increase in mpg grow from tANK # 6 TO # 10. Also have an old Ford full sized tractor/loader that I struggled to keep running. Using XP3 has made this beast purrr like a kitten with noticeably more power for moving dirt, down trees, etc. Using it in 4 wheelers, chain saws, splitters, 3 cars and GMC truck with VERY noticeable increase in fuel mileage/efficiency. Looking forward to using it in boats and mowers in the summer. All family members experiencing same positive results. More than impressed!!! Wish all a Merry Christmas and a more economical New Year![

RICH4NURICHE
Hi my name is Mike of Mpls and I saw a XP3 product demo which not only proved this product gets rid of water in fuel but also raised shocking awareness that another product actually gelled up in the test tube and I am warning everyone to stay away from that makers products as they can damage the engine over time.

XP3 works well and does increase mileage by 1-5 miles per gallon which can save a trucker or fleet of vehicles a large amount of money over time! XP3 also claims to save on mechanical costs which I cant comment on but I stand behind the product as both Pepsi and Coke use XP3 in their fleets.

The test tube results were good and the early testimonies seen so far are positive, if both Pepsi and Coke bottling are using this nation wide in their fleets and have been for some time now that tells me XP3 is a benefical product and anyone putting more than 50 miles per day on a vehicle should use XP3 to save them money over a period of time. People also claim this product helps improve power and engine performance! Another plus for XP3

Mike of Minneapolis, MN

thereishope12: if both Pepsi and Coke bottling are using this nation wide in their fleets
Can you provide a link PROVING that statement?
Other than limited test in Mexico I have not seen any evidence of "are using nationwide".
Since you are in the U.S. we must assume you mean in the U.S.


thereishope12: XP3 also claims to save on mechanical costs which I cant comment on but I stand behind the product as both Pepsi and Coke use XP3 in their fleets.
Claims are not proof.
Show us proof Pepsi and Coke continue to use XP3 in their U.S fleets, or any country.
Not just a one time test in Mexico.

Happy Healthy Wealthy New Year,

Seems the only ones who post any positive news on these gas additives are the one post wonders. As you go back over these threads, none seem to repost, so are we scaring them away with facts, or do they discover for themselves that these all do the same thing, clean up a little carbon in upper cyclinders and injectors, and that is when you see no further posts.

You have to ask why? The same history on these exists for years I have followed them all, and they all end the same, just name one additive company which is still around after a year or so at most. I can go back over a decade and not a single company who avoided the EPA lab test has lasted more than a year. Enviro-Max lasted two years as I recall, but they all fold when users discover that they see a small improvement over a few tanks of treatment, the same as you would see using many of the name brand gas treatments for for less money.

Bottom line, history speaks louder than any amatuer passive useage testimonials, never mind the hyped up claims. If you want to evaluate any of these miracle gas additives, at least go out and invest in a ScanGuage to accurately check your fuel consumption, they only cost $150. or so, and will worth it if you are seriously wanting to see real and accurate results.

Good luck to all,